Using Statues, Reliefs, and Coins as Primary Evidence: The Apotheotic Polemic Among the Hellenistic MonarchiesTimothy Y. Ahern
Program: History: Capstone-Thesis: Master of Arts (MA)
Awarded: October 2022
Capstone Instructor: Dr. Kimberly Rush
Abstract: The Hellenistic period revolutionized Greek culture in just about every way imaginable. One of the things that began changing was the Greek sense of self. Generally speaking, before Alexander individual Greek identity was often associated with a specific city state. Yet, as Alexander’s army expanded the Greco-Macedonian world, which Hellenized the lands that Alexander conquered, with that geographical extension came a broadened sense of citizenship that with the individual often embraced a much larger world. Arguably, the Hellenistic age began with Alexander’s father, Philip II’s unification of the Greek city states, but this brave new Hellenized cosmos had an Achilles heel. Upon Philip II’s death in 336 BCE Alexander inherited a Macedonian court that when compared to a Medieval European counterpart was remarkably egalitarian. Alexander’s death accordingly left an insidious power vacuum in the center of the Hellenized world. The historiography of this period has tended to focus on the ensuing wars fought among Alexander’s successors over his conquered land. However, the strife among his successors, his diadochoi, was not merely over territory, but equally important in their day was the battle over Alexander’s legacy. This evolved into a polemic that went on in iconography. There was a background to this struggle for the mind. Considered hubris for the day by ancient authors, Philip II deified himself in 336 BCE, and Alexander followed suit in 332 following the proclamation of the oracle of Siwa that announced that Alexander was the son of Zeus-Amun Ra. Accordingly, that laid down a challenge to Alexander’s successors. To a relative degree, by 323 BCE, a legitimate claim to the legacy of Alexander was culturally necessitated to have to have some kind of claim of divinity. Consequently, the death of Alexander did not just initiate wars over land, but it also launched an apotheotic polemic among the diadochoi. Often overlooked by scholars, this semiotic polemic expressed itself in apotheotic iconography through the Hellenistic Age. It was a tug of war through symbolism over who had the rightful claim to the legacy of Alexander, and this thesis will document some of the key elements to this battle over image as it was conducted through Hellenistic iconography.